Temperature Sender AJ16

Moderators: BigCatXJS, dhdove, davidr

davidr
Posts: 1730
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 8:31 pm
Location: Salisbury, Wilts

Re: Temperature Sender AJ16

Postby davidr » Wed Sep 12, 2018 9:26 pm

So how to test and compare them? Well they work by varying their resistance across the temperature range so I thought I'd test them using a digital thermometer and a multimeter.
So this is the reading on the thermometer
File 09-09-2018, 18 11 34.jpeg
And this was the resistance reading for the original sensor of 1343 ohms
File 09-09-2018, 18 13 07.jpeg
And an identical temperature reading for the new sensor
File 09-09-2018, 18 13 54.jpeg
And the resistance was only 916 ohms
File 09-09-2018, 18 13 29.jpeg
So the result of my experiment was........................failure!!
Anyone like to buy a slightly used temperature sensor for an X300? :?

User avatar
Tintin
Posts: 531
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2016 10:51 am

Re: Temperature Sender AJ16

Postby Tintin » Thu Sep 13, 2018 9:34 am

This link gives the possible explanation?

https://www.xj40.com/viewtopic.php?t=996579

Robbie
1996 4 litre XJS Celebration 2+2
Daimler Sovereign S1 4.2 1971

davidr
Posts: 1730
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 8:31 pm
Location: Salisbury, Wilts

Re: Temperature Sender AJ16

Postby davidr » Sun Oct 28, 2018 5:28 pm

Too cold for gardening today (or so I told 'er indoors) so a bit of messing about in the workshop was permitted.
I took the original temperature sensor from my car and the DAC2583 I bought in. I wired them both up to my multimeter set to measure resistance and then heated up the sensor using a hot air gun.
Using a digital thermometer I then charted the resistance of each sensor as it cooled from 100 to 40 degrees C. This was repeated 4 times for each sensor and the results averaged to get a more accurate reading. The chart below is the average reading for each sensor.
graph.png
The resistance is up the side (in ohms) and the temperature along the bottom (in degrees Celcius).
As you can see there is a steady relationship between the 2 sensors with the DAC2583 having a consistently lower resistance reading.
I did some sums and the difference within the key working temperatures (ie 60-100 degrees) between the averages of my readings is between 44 and 46 ohms at each reading.
So I have invested £2.74 in a 45 ohm resistor from Hong Kong via eBay and then I'll try making up a link lead to see if that gives the right readings on my car.
By the way, nothing wrong with my sensor - just curious!

User avatar
RichardSEL
Posts: 640
Joined: Thu May 26, 2016 6:29 pm

Re: Temperature Sender AJ16

Postby RichardSEL » Mon Oct 29, 2018 9:39 am

I've changed both my CTS sensors for new from main dealer (Denso made in Japan so must be OK :P ) on both my XJ8 -- both gave consistently better MPG after the change >30MPG mixed mode, light foot, long run
So interesting results you're getting -- seems from what you're observing that it's not that old sensors get "tired" and don't change their resistance. But time taken to change resistivity for a given temperature change increases?

Is it possible, now that you've got a jig set up, to see whether that's true -- old sensor vs new?
Gone: '59 Mark I, '56 Mark VIIM, '59 Mark IX, '01 XJ8 Sovereign 4L LWB, '01 XJ8 Sport 3.2L
+others I'd prefer to forget 8)
Current: '01 XJ8 Exec 3.2L
In trim shop for total refurb: '73 Owen Sedanca 4.2L
Stalled in storage '61 Mark IX with 4.2L

davidr
Posts: 1730
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 8:31 pm
Location: Salisbury, Wilts

Re: Temperature Sender AJ16

Postby davidr » Mon Oct 29, 2018 2:34 pm

Richard -what this shows is the relationship between the 2 sensors.
The original DAC11079 was taken from my car (and it works fine) just for the sake of this experiment. As it is NLA and I get frequent questions I obtained the DAC2583 to see if that could be made to work.
The chart in my post has the resistance values for the 2 sensors across the working temperature range. Original sensor (DAC11079) in orange and the substitute (DAC2583) in blue.
The resistance of the DAC2583 is consistently around 45ohms less than the original. This is just because they are made to a different spec and not because the older one has degraded. The original behaves exactly as I would expect and the needle sits just below N on the gauge. The DAC2583 would make the gauge read hot when the engine is perfectly fine.
I'm not sure what you're getting at with time to change resistivity? Are you wondering how quickly the resistance changes with temperature? As temperature change would be much more gradual than my test (ie the coolant warms up much slower than me putting a hot air gun on the sensor) I think I'd say that I didn't notice any difference between their reactions although I can't think how to test that. They both warmed up and cooled down much quicker than they would in the car and neither appeared to have any lag in the readings.

User avatar
RichardSEL
Posts: 640
Joined: Thu May 26, 2016 6:29 pm

Re: Temperature Sender AJ16

Postby RichardSEL » Tue Oct 30, 2018 10:56 am

That's not to say that my style of CTS would be anything like what you're testing -- looks exactly like yours though. Just curious to know in what way my old CTSs had deteriorated over the lifetime of the vehicles compared to the new that've now both been installed (Sport now sold).
I still have one old one left in my box of "may come in handy" bits
Gone: '59 Mark I, '56 Mark VIIM, '59 Mark IX, '01 XJ8 Sovereign 4L LWB, '01 XJ8 Sport 3.2L
+others I'd prefer to forget 8)
Current: '01 XJ8 Exec 3.2L
In trim shop for total refurb: '73 Owen Sedanca 4.2L
Stalled in storage '61 Mark IX with 4.2L

User avatar
poprivet
Posts: 1604
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2006 3:20 pm
Location: Hampshire

Re: Temperature Sender AJ16

Postby poprivet » Tue Oct 30, 2018 11:31 am

Interesting results and useful info. I imagine David's sender is for the temperature gauge? not the one that sends info to the engine computer, just wondering if Richard is describing that one.

Regarding deteriation, these are standard thermisters packaged conveniently. I would think they fail either open or closed circuit, I doubt that the resistance range would change, happy to be proved wrong though.
1988 3.6 XJ-S coupe
'Remember that the value of your investment can plummet as well as fall'

davidr
Posts: 1730
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 8:31 pm
Location: Salisbury, Wilts

Re: Temperature Sender AJ16

Postby davidr » Tue Oct 30, 2018 2:11 pm

Yes - these are temperature senders for the instrument pack.
The sensor for the engine management sits alongside it in the thermostat housing and is a different part number and thankfully still available.

davidr
Posts: 1730
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 8:31 pm
Location: Salisbury, Wilts

Re: Temperature Sender AJ16

Postby davidr » Sun Dec 02, 2018 11:33 pm

Update on my little experiment.
I got a 45ohm resistor and made up a link lead as below. The idea of this is to put it between the sensor and the original connector to adjust the resistance and so give the right signal to the gauge.
image.jpeg
I replaced my original, correct and working sensor with the CAC2583 and let the car come up to temperature. There is no fault with my cooling system and the gauge normally comes up to just the start of N on the dial which is just as it should be.
Here is the gauge with just the DAC2583 and no link lead.
image.jpeg
As you can see, it reads too high making it look like the car is too hot. In fact it was spot which was confirmed by my infra-red thermometer.
I then put my link lead in.
image.jpeg
Now the gauge shows too cool. Again I stress, the car was actually spot on correct temperature.

Conclusions? I'm on the right path but I haven't got the resistance right yet! So a couple more orders have been placed for resistors from my eBay friends in China! :D
XJS FORUM COORDINATOR
1996 XJS Celebration Conv. (shown on the JEC stand at NEC Nov 2015)
2001 XKR Convertible

Previously enjoyed!
1989 XJ-S V12 Coupe. 2006 XJ TDVi Sovereign. 1995 XJ6 3.2. 2013 XF 2.2d. 2009 X Type 2.0d Sovereign estate


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest